4.5 Article

Integrating a Smartphone and Molecular Modeling for Determining the Binding Constant and Stoichiometry. Ratio of the Iron(II)-Phenanthroline Complex: An Activity for Analytical and Physical Chemistry Laboratories

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION
Volume 93, Issue 10, Pages 1760-1765

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00112

Keywords

First-Year Undergraduate/General; Analytical Chemistry; Laboratory Instruction; Physical Chemistry; Hands-On Learning/Manipulatives; Computational Chemistry; Molecular Modeling; UV-Vis Spectrokopy

Funding

  1. CAPES
  2. PPGQ/UFRN
  3. CNPq/Capes project [070/2012, 305962/2014-0]
  4. FAPERN [PPP 005/2012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The binding constant and stoichiometry ratio for the formation of iron(II)-(1,10-phenanthroline) or iron(II)-o-phenanthroline complexes has been determined by a combination of a low-cost analytical method using a smartphone and a molecular modeling method as a laboratory experiment designed for analytical and physical chemistry courses. Intensity values were obtained from the digital images by measuring the RGB (red, green, blue) values (on a scale of 0-255 in intensity) of the samples between Fe(II) and o-phenanthroline using a digital camera from a smartphone. The R channel showed the best linearity for predicting the binding constant. For computational studies, iron(II) complexes using water molecules and 1,10-phenanthroline were used to evaluate the stability of the complex by varying the number of ligands. Complexes have been optimized by reaching a minimum amount of energy. It was possible to observe how stable the complexes are from the optimization calculations, including aspects about the achieved geometries. The approach provides a simple method for performing stability constants over a wide range of complexes, from the undergraduate chemistry laboratories, in the field, and in the research laboratory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available