The impossible energy trinity: Energy security, sustainability, and sovereignty in cross-border electricity systems

The article explores energy policy tradeoffs faced by states that expand renewable electricity production and are part of cross-border electricity systems. We develop the concept of an impossible energy trinity (IET), which posits that many states cannot simultaneously achieve energy security, sustainability, and sovereignty. We argue that these states have three options to cope with the challenge of intermittent electricity production from domestic renewables. The dirty option resorts to base or reserve electric generating capacity from non-sustainable sources. The insecure option accepts system stability risks and/or higher electricity prices. The nonautonomous option cedes control over domestic energy rules to pursue integration with neighboring electricity grids and markets. We empirically illustrate our novel concept using the case of Switzerland, which finds itself at the crossroads of the three options. The country has to choose whether to add conventional generation capacities, accept grid instabilities and higher electricity prices, or integrate with the EU electricity market and rules. We discuss generalizations to other countries and ways to manage the IET. We conclude that public pressure for decarbonization and economic pressure to maintain secure energy supply render the nonautonomous option most likely in many states. The operation and governance of transboundary grid structure thereby influence energy transitions on national and subnational scales.

Automated summary

The article discusses the energy policy tradeoffs faced by states expanding renewable electricity production, introducing the concept of an "impossible energy trinity" which posits that achieving energy security, sustainability, and sovereignty simultaneously is difficult for many states. It outlines three options for states dealing with intermittent electricity production from domestic renewables, and uses Switzerland as a case study to empirically illustrate the concept. The article concludes that the nonautonomous option, which involves integrating with neighboring electricity grids and markets, is likely to be the most common choice for states under public pressure for decarbonization and economic pressure to maintain secure energy supply.