4.2 Article

The Personality Assessment Screener as a Predictor of Self-Injuring Thoughts and Behavior Crisis Events in a Male Prison Sample

Journal

CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 49, Issue 9, Pages 1311-1322

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/00938548221082656

Keywords

Personality Assessment Screener; corrections; longitudinal assessment; suicide; mental health screening

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that mental disorders are common in correctional settings, and there is a high potential for suicide and self-harm among detainees. The Personality Assessment Screener (PAS) has the potential to identify mental health problems, but few studies have predicted crisis events related to self-injuring thoughts and behaviors. The study suggests that repeated PAS administrations can effectively identify individuals at risk for self-harm crisis events in prison.
Mental disorder is widespread in correctional settings, as is the potential for suicide and self-harm among detained individuals. The ability of the Personality Assessment Screener (PAS) to identify potential mental health problems has been the focus of recent research in corrections, but few studies have examined the prediction of crisis events related to self-injuring thoughts and behaviors. We explored the utility of repeated PAS administrations among men incarcerated in prison (N = 270) to identify those at risk for a subsequent crisis event involving potential self-harm. Baseline PAS total scores predicted the odds of experiencing a crisis event (odds ratio = 3.76-4.46) and, importantly, changes in PAS total scores over time incrementally predicted such events beyond scores assessed at a single time-point, t(49) = -2.14, p = .037. These preliminary findings demonstrate promise for the PAS as an indicator of potential self-injuring crisis events when administered at intake and regular intervals throughout incarceration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available