4.2 Article

Trajectories and biopsychosocial predictors of daily acute pain in adolescents receiving treatment for pain: a daily diary study

Journal

JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages 613-621

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10865-022-00297-3

Keywords

Acute pain; Trajectories; Daily dairy; Sleep; Pain interference

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [1R01DA044778]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explored the trajectories and correlates of pain intensity among adolescents with acute pain. Three trajectories of pain intensity were identified, and stable pain was associated with higher anxiety levels. Better sleep quality predicted lower pain intensity and interference. The study suggests the need for future research utilizing intensive longitudinal methodology to guide intervention development and prevent chronic pain transition.
Research regarding daily acute pain and its correlates has primarily been conducted with adolescents who have had major surgery or musculoskeletal pain, restraining efforts towards adapting interventions for adolescents with other sources of acute pain. We explored the trajectories and correlates of pain intensity. Adolescents with an opioid prescription to treat acute pain (N = 157) completed demographic questions, and the PROMIS pediatric depression and anxiety subscales. A 10-day daily diary assessed pain intensity, pain interference, sleep quality, and opioid use. Three trajectories of pain intensity emerged: (1) slow decreases in pain, (2) rapid decreases in pain, and (3) stable or slight increases in pain. Teens with stable pain demonstrated the greatest anxiety levels. Higher sleep quality predicted lower next day pain intensity and pain interference, when controlling for opioid use. Future research should employ intensive longitudinal methodology to further guide intervention development and prevent the transition to chronic pain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available