4.1 Article

Internalized homophobia and HIV testing among Korean gay and bisexual men: a study in a high-income country with pervasive HIV/AIDS stigma

Journal

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2022.2083056

Keywords

Bisexual man; gay man; HIV testing; internalized homophobia; South Korea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Limited research has been conducted on factors contributing to HIV testing among sexual minority populations in South Korea. This study found a significant association between internalized homophobia and past 12-month HIV testing among cisgender gay and bisexual men in Korea.
Limited research has been conducted on factors contributing to HIV testing among sexual minority populations in South Korea (hereafter, Korea), where stigma against homosexuality and HIV/AIDS is pervasive. We used a nationwide cross-sectional survey of 907 Korean cisgender gay and bisexual (GB) men who were HIV-negative or HIV-unknown in 2016. Regarding internalized homophobia (IHP), participants were categorized into tertiles (low, moderate, and high). Past 12-month HIV testing was assessed via a single yes/no question. Using a modified Poisson regression model, we examined the association between IHP and HIV testing among cisgender GB men in Korea. The overall prevalence of obtaining an HIV test was 41.8% among Korean cisgender GB men. We also found a statistically significant association between IHP and past 12-month HIV testing in this population. Specifically, participants with low IHP had a higher prevalence of HIV testing (adjusted PR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.14-1.65) compared to those with high IHP. Given these findings, more efforts are needed in Korea to enhance GB men's access to HIV testing, such as improving social circumstances to lower IHP of GB men and creating an environment that enables and facilitates GB men to receive HIV testing without stigma against their sexual identity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available