4.2 Article

COVID-19 Exposure and Family Impact Scales for Adolescents and Young Adults

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages 631-640

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsac036

Keywords

adolescents; COVID-19; families; pediatric; trauma; young adults

Funding

  1. Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [U54GM104941]
  2. State of Delaware
  3. Nemours Center for Healthcare Delivery Science
  4. Center for Pediatric Traumatic Stress [U79SM080048]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adolescents and young adults and developed the CEFIS-AYA scale specifically for this population. The results showed that the pandemic had a slightly negative impact on AYAs, with various factors contributing to their exposure and the resulting impact, and there were differences in scores based on gender and age.
Objective To understand the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on adolescents and young adults (AYAs), we adapted the COVID-19 Exposure and Family Impact Scales (CEFIS; ) for AYAs. Here, we report on the development, structure, and psychometric properties of the CEFIS-AYA. Methods The CEFIS-AYA was developed by a multidisciplinary, multi-institutional team using a rapid iterative process. Data from 3,912 AYAs from 21 programs at 16 institutions across the United States were collected from May 2020 to April 2021. We examined the underlying structure of the CEFIS-AYA using principal component analysis (PCA), calculated internal consistencies, and explored differences in scores by gender and age. Results Participants reported exposure to a range of COVID-19-related events (M = 9.08 events, of 28). On the bidirectional 4-point Impact scale, mean item scores were mostly above the midpoint, indicating a slightly negative impact. Kuder-Richardson 20/Cronbach's Alpha was good for Exposure (alpha = .76) and excellent for Impact (alpha = .93). PCA identified seven factors for Exposure (Severe COVID-19, Loss of Income, Limited Access to Essentials, COVID-19 Exposure, Disruptions to Activities, Disruptions to Living Conditions, and Designation as an Essential Worker) and five for Impact (Self and Family Relationships, Physical Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, Social Well-Being, and Distress). Gender and age differences in CEFIS-AYA scores were identified. Discussion Initial reliability data are strong and support use of the CEFIS-AYA for measuring the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on AYAs in research and clinical care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available