4.5 Article

Revisiting (dis)fluency: Metacognitive difficulty as a novelty cue that evokes feeling-of-interest

Journal

PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING
Volume 39, Issue 8, Pages 1451-1466

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mar.21664

Keywords

disfluency; fluency; innovation; interest; metacognition; novelty

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Contrary to conventional belief and existing literature, recent research suggests that difficult-to-read fonts in marketing communications may lead to positive consumer evaluation of unique, complex, or security-related products. The positive effects of perceptual disfluency are explained by the perceived novelty and subsequent interest and intention to try the product.
Contrary to conventional belief and the existing literature, recent research has shown that difficult-to-read fonts on marketing communications may evoke perceptual disfluency and enhance consumer evaluation toward unique, complex, or security-related products. However, no research has examined the psychological mechanism that underlies the positive effects of perceptual disfluency. The current research presents five experiments to address this study gap. Specifically, Studies 1 and 2 provide empirical evidence that perceptual disfluency may lead to perceived novelty and in turn evoke the feeling-of-interest, perceived innovativeness, and intention to try a product. Studies 3 and 4 replicate these findings and show that such an indirect effect of perceptual disfluency is mitigated by the presence of salient novelty cues and prior product knowledge, providing further support for the hypothesized disfluency-novelty-interest relationship. Study 5 extended these findings by showing that digital ad banners with disfluent text may enhance click-throughs in a natural viewing task of a news website. The current findings empirically demonstrate a mechanism that not only underlies the positive effects of perceptual disfluency but also aligns with the fluency-familiarity-liking relationship found in the existing literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available