Journal
HIGHER EDUCATION
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-022-00847-3
Keywords
Equity; Equality; Covid19; Discourse; Academic development
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This paper explores the conceptions of inequalities and their relations to educational equity in the early stages of the transition to online education. It analyzes the cultural and structural discursive positions of higher education practitioners and their institutions, and the conflicts they faced in adopting, shaping, deferring or resisting certain discourses. The perspectives of learning technologists, academic developers, and Higher Education Studies scholars from South Africa and the UK provide insights into the possibilities and challenges of equity in higher education.
In the early stages of the 'pivot online', various conceptions of inequalities and their relations to educational equity peppered the discourses of higher education practitioners and the promotional discourses of their institutions. Concerned with what conditions subjectification and action within micro- and meso-curricula, this paper explores the cultural and structural discursive positions in which such agents are entangled, and the discourse conflicts they negotiated about what to adopt, shape, defer or resist. Offering deliberations on the possibilities and problematics for equity in higher education were insiders' perspectives of those who operate in the thresholds between academic and professional communities within South African and UK higher education-learning technologists, academic developers and Higher Education Studies scholars-in the period from March to June 2020. Careful not to provide a monovocal nor hierarchical interpretation of these discourses at that early stage in the pandemic, our analysis rather juxtaposes complex and at times conflicting local accounts and negotiations of three schisms around which their narratives skirted: (i) the substantial fault lines under and in societies, institutions and practitioner communities; (ii) the complexities which intersect with digital divides; and (iii) the in/visibility of differentially impacted individuals and groups during that period. As people with often strong ethico-political commitments, and responsibilities as members of evanescent interpretative communities, their acts of narration drew from and at times against the dominant discourses situated within particular socio-economic and ideological higher education contexts.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available