4.3 Article

Do Hypertensive Men Spy With an Angry Little Eye? Anger Recognition in Men With Essential Hypertension-Cross-sectional and Prospective Findings

Journal

ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE
Volume 56, Issue 9, Pages 875-889

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaab108

Keywords

Hypertension; Blood pressure; Trait anger; Anger recognition (bias); Mixed emotions

Funding

  1. Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Forderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung (SNF, Swiss National Science Foundation) [PP00P1_128565/1]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation, DFG Centre of Excellence 2117 Centre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour) [422037984, INST 38/550-1]
  3. German Scholars Organization [GSO/CZS 02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found an anger recognition bias in men with essential hypertension, and overrating displayed anger in combination with higher trait anger appears to predict future blood pressure increases.
Background Higher trait anger has inconsistently been associated with hypertension and hypertension development, but social context in terms of recognition of other persons' anger has been neglected in this context. Purpose Here, we investigated anger recognition of facial affect and trait anger in essential hypertensive and normotensive men in addition to prospective associations with blood pressure (BP) increases. Methods Baseline assessment comprised a total of 145 participants including 57 essential hypertensive and 65 normotensive men who were otherwise healthy and medication-free. Seventy-two eligible participants additionally completed follow-up assessment 3.1 (+/- 0.08 SEM) years later to analyze BP changes over time. We assessed emotion recognition of facial affect with a paradigm displaying mixed facial affect of two morphed basic emotions including anger, fear, sadness, and happiness. Trait anger was assessed with the Spielberger trait anger scale. Results Cross-sectionally, we found that with increasing BP, hypertensive men overrated anger displayed in facial expressions of mixed emotions as compared to normotensive men (ps <= .019) while there were no differences in trait anger (p = .16). Prospectively, the interaction between mean anger recognition and trait anger independently predicted BP increases from baseline to follow-up (ps <= .043), in that overrating displayed anger predicted future BP increases only if trait anger was high. Conclusions Our findings indicate an anger recognition bias in men with essential hypertension and that overrating displayed anger in combination with higher trait anger seems to predict future BP increases. This might be of clinical relevance for the development and progression of hypertension and cardiovascular disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available