4.7 Article

Reviewing the applications of artificial intelligence in sustainable supply chains: Exploring research propositions for future directions

Journal

BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages 2400-2423

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bse.3034

Keywords

artificial intelligence; big data analytics; business strategy; carbon emissions; environment; sustainability; sustainable development; sustainable supply chain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the role of AI in establishing an SSC through a systematic literature review. The research trends in AI in SSC are analyzed and discussed, and a research framework is proposed to help researchers and practitioners develop an SSC model using AI-based techniques.
The sustainable supply chain (SSC) has received significant attention worldwide in the last few years because it integrates sustainability dimensions into its process. Recent artificial intelligence (AI)-based advancements in technology make it possible to overcome many problems associated with supply chain (SC) networks. The current study was performed to explore the role of AI in establishing an SSC. The research contribution in the field of AI and SSC was examined through a systematic literature review. A total of 353 articles were gathered from the Scopus database in the selected research field. A big data-based approach, namely, structural topic modelling (STM), was applied to generate emerging thematic topics from shortlisted articles of AI in SSC. Moreover, using R package, a bibliometric analysis was conducted to examine the research trends in the field of AI in SSC. The research trends were then analysed, with generated thematic topics discussed. The proposed research framework can help researchers and practitioners to develop an SSC model using AI-based techniques. Propositions for future research are given and implications are suggested.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available