4.7 Article

Social distancing and store choice in times of a pandemic

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102860

Keywords

Social distancing; Consumer behavior; Choice experiment; COVID-19

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [SES-2031 841]
  2. Chilean National Agency for Research and Development's Scholarship Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the trade-off between social distancing measures and increased waiting times during the COVID-19 pandemic was investigated. The results showed that customers were willing to wait longer to access stores with better social distancing measures.
Public health officials enforced several measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic that affected grocery stores, such as limits on store capacities and enforcement of masks and physical distancing among customers. Nevertheless, these measures can provoke queues, which could drive customers away from stores. In this study, we investigate how customers trade off between social distancing measures and increased waiting times during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our data comes from an online survey applied in New York City in May 2020. This survey included a set of discrete choice experiments framed in virtual stores, as well as a set of psychometric indicators regarding the pandemic. With this data, we estimated a latent class conditional logit model where assignment to classes is correlated with COVID-19 latent variables. We identified three latent classes with preference structures that valued social distancing to varying degrees. In spite of this heterogeneity in preferences, we found that customers were willing to wait longer to access stores with better social distancing measures. This result suggests that stores could increase, rather than decrease, their sales if they enforce public health measures at the expense of longer waiting times.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available