4.7 Article

Take it or leave it?: Evidence on cultural differences affecting return behaviour for Gen Z

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102942

Keywords

Return behaviour; Return service; Retailing; Cultural dimensions; Gen Z

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines consumers' return behavior in China and Italy, two different cultural contexts. The findings reveal that cultural differences influence consumers' willingness to return at different stages of the purchase process. The study provides theoretical and managerial insights and suggests future research directions.
Both culture and age have a direct impact on consumers' shopping behaviour. Similarly, this paper explores consumers' return behaviour in two different cultural contexts, China and Italy, characterized by low/high individualism vs. high/low collectivism. To this end, the research employs a qualitative approach based on semistructured interviews collected in May and June 2020 for a sample of Generation Z consumers in China and Italy. Results show differences and similarities affecting consumers' willingness to return in the different stages of effective purchase behaviour. For instance, in the pre-purchase stage, Chinese consumers often show a limited interest in return policies since they usually prefer not to return and repurchase otherwhere the product to maximize their cost-benefit trade-off. In contrast, when retailers adopt return policies, Italian consumers are more interested in feeling protected against the risk of wrong purchases. Instead, both samples are very attentive in return and refund efficiency in the post-purchase stage, which are perceived as two discriminating factors in terms of repurchase from the same retailers. This study offers theoretical and managerial insights towards consumers' return behaviour, offering new directions for future studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available