4.7 Article

Do tax reforms affect income distribution? Evidence from developing countries

Journal

ECONOMIC MODELLING
Volume 110, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105804

Keywords

Income distribution; Gini; Fiscal policy; Impulse response functions; Endogeneity; Nonlinearities; Government size

Categories

Funding

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [INV-009395]
  2. FCT (Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia) [UIDB/05069/2020]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [UIDB/05069/2020] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study empirically assesses the impact of tax reforms on income distribution in developing countries, using a new narrative database of reforms in 45 emerging and low-income countries. The results show that personal income tax reforms and strengthening of revenue administration can lower the Gini coefficient and increase the bottom income share, except in sub-Saharan Africa. To reduce inequality at a faster pace, it is more effective to implement tax reforms during slower economic growth. Furthermore, the impact of tax reforms on inequality is greater in countries with smaller government spending and a simplified tax system.
We empirically assess the impact of tax reforms on income distribution in developing countries. We apply the local projection method to a new narrative database of Mx reforms covering 45 emerging and low-income countries. Reforms of the personal income or strengthening of the revenue administration lower the disposable Gini and increase the bottom income share. This result does not hold for sub-Saharan Africa. To reduce inequality M a faster pace, it would be more effective to implement Mx reforms when the economy is growing relatively slowly. Finally, the smaller the government spending envelope and the smaller the Mx system, the larger the beneficial impact of Mx reforms on inequality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available