4.3 Review

A systematic review of the evidence relating to disclosure of psychological distress by mental health professionals within the workplace

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 78, Issue 9, Pages 1712-1738

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.23339

Keywords

disclosure; mental health professionals; psychological distress; stigma; workplace

Funding

  1. Health Education England

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review examines the prevalence and choices of disclosure of psychological distress among mental health professionals in the workplace. The findings suggest that professionals are less likely to disclose their distress at work compared to social circles, and they often have negative experiences when they do. The fear of stigma is a major barrier to disclosure. Factors affecting the level of disclosure include the recipient, trust, quality of supervision, conceptualization of distress, and type of problem. Some professionals find disclosure to be valuable. However, the limitations of the included studies call for caution in interpreting the conclusions. Further research is needed to explore the complexities of disclosure choices for mental health professionals.
Objective To systematically review evidence regarding prevalence and choices of disclosure of psychological distress, by mental health professionals within the workplace. Methods Six databases were searched in June 2020. Studies were included if they were published in English language and included empirical quantitative, qualitative or mixed-methods data. Studies were excluded if they focused on general healthcare professionals or the general population, or on stress or physical health problems. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Quality Appraisal tool. Results Nine studies, with a total of 1891 participants, were included. Study quality varied, with studies generally reporting descriptive surveys using hypothetical disclosure scenarios. Distress was often conceptualized in psychiatric terms. These limitations mean conclusions should be treated with caution. Individuals were less likely to disclose in work and had negative experiences of doing so compared to social circles. Fear of stigma inhibited disclosure. There were differing levels of disclosure relating to recipient, trust, quality of supervision, how distress was conceptualized, and type of problem. Disclosure was experienced by some as valuable. Conclusion There is a need for further research, which addresses the nuanced complexities surrounding disclosure choices for mental health professionals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available