4.6 Article

Fully automated stroke tissue estimation using random forest classifiers (FASTER)

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 37, Issue 8, Pages 2728-2741

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0271678X16674221

Keywords

Acute stroke; magnetic resonance perfusion; magnetic resonance diffusion imaging; endovascular therapy; mathematical modeling

Funding

  1. Swiss Heart Foundation
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF SPUM) [140340]
  3. BNF program of the University of Bern

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several clinical trials have recently proven the efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy for treating ischemic stroke, within a six-hour window for therapy. To move beyond treatment windows and toward personalized risk assessment, it is essential to accurately identify the extent of tissue-at-risk (penumbra). We introduce a fully automated method to estimate the penumbra volume using multimodal MRI (diffusion-weighted imaging, a T2w- and T1w contrast-enhanced sequence, and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI). The method estimates tissue-at-risk by predicting tissue damage in the case of both persistent occlusion and of complete recanalization. When applied to 19 test cases with a thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grading of 1-2a, mean overestimation of final lesion volume was 30 ml, compared with 121 ml for manually corrected thresholding. Predicted tissue-at-risk volume was positively correlated with final lesion volume (p<0.05). We conclude that prediction of tissue damage in the event of either persistent occlusion or immediate and complete recanalization, from spatial features derived from MRI, provides a substantial improvement beyond predefined thresholds. It may serve as an alternative method for identifying tissue-at-risk that may aid in treatment selection in ischemic stroke.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available