4.5 Article

Organizing for knowledge creation in a strategic interorganizational innovation project

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages 398-410

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.03.011

Keywords

Interorganizational; Innovation; Managing strategic project; Organizing; Knowledge creation

Categories

Funding

  1. TEKES Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation [2923/31/2014, 32.20.40.3/14]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzes a strategic interorganizational innovation project and proposes iterative process, self-organizing working groups, and dynamic participation as practices for joint knowledge creation and innovation progress. It provides insights for managing strategic interorganizational projects.
A fundamental challenge for interorganizational innovation projects is employing diverse actors' knowledge, expertise and perspectives for situation-specific demands of complex innovation. Innovation advancement is dependent on the degree to which knowledge is used and synthesized to address emerging and situation-specific demands of innovation. The goal of this study is to shed light on organizing for joint knowledge creation in a strategic interorganizational innovation project. Based on an inductive analysis of interview data from one strategic interorganizational innovation project, we identified the iterative process, self-organizing working groups and dynamic participation as practices through which the actors involved arranged and enacted their joint efforts, namely, knowledge creation and progress of innovation. This study contributes to research on managing strategic interorganizational projects by suggesting that organizing, which involves structural and informal organizing practices, supports managing strategic interorganizational projects where the diverse actors' knowledge integration is at the core of the innovation project's goals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available