4.6 Article

Effect of hypertension and peroxynitrite decomposition with FeTMPyP on CBF and stroke outcome

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages 1276-1285

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0271678X16654158

Keywords

Arterioles; cerebral blood flow; focal ischemia; hypertension; reperfusion

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [P01 HL095488]
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grant [R01 NS093289]
  3. Totman Medical Research Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the effect of peroxynitrite decomposition catalyst FeTMPyP treatment on perfusion deficit, vascular function and stroke outcome in Wistar (n=26) and spontaneously hypertensive rats stroke-prone (SHRSP; n=26) that underwent tMCAO for 2h or Sham operation. Peri-infarct CBF was measured by hydrogen clearance in the absence or presence of FeTMPyP (10mg/kg, i.v.) or vehicle 10min before reperfusion. Myogenic tone of parenchymal arterioles (PAs) was measured as an indication of small vessel resistance (SVR). Baseline CBF was similar between Wistar and SHRSP (114 +/- 12 vs. 132 +/- 9mL/100g/min); however, MCAO caused greater perfusion deficit in SHRSP (24 +/- 6 vs. 7 +/- 1mL/100g/min; p<0.05) and increased infarct volume by TTC (12 +/- 6 vs. 32 +/- 2%; p<0.05). Reperfusion CBF was decreased from baseline in both SHRSP and Wistar (54 +/- 16 and 46 +/- 19mL/100g/min; p<0.05), suggesting increased infarction in SHRSP was related to greater perfusion deficit. PAs from SHRSP had increased tone vs. Wistar that was enhanced after tMCAO. FeTMPyP treatment did not affect CBF during ischemia or reperfusion, or tone of PAs, but decreased the incidence of hemorrhage in SHRSP by 50%. Thus, increased tone in PAs from SHRSP could increase perfusion deficit during MCAO that was not alleviated by FeTMPyP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available