4.3 Article

Stigmatizing Policies Interact with Mental Health and Sexual Behaviours to Structurally Induce HIV Diagnoses Among European Men Who Have Sex with Men

Journal

AIDS AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 26, Issue 10, Pages 3400-3410

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-022-03683-9

Keywords

MSM; Europe; Policy; Stigma; HIV; Structural determinants

Funding

  1. Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency (Chafea) [2015 71 01]
  2. Swedish Ministry of Health
  3. Arctic University of Norway
  4. University Hospital of North Norway for Russia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Structural stigma and policies interact with anxiety/depression and sexual behaviors to influence HIV disparities among MSM in Europe.
Structural stigma shapes men who have sex with men's (MSM's) mental health and sexual behaviours. The aim of this study was to examine how stigmatizing policies interact with downstream anxiety/depression and sexual behaviours to structurally pattern HIV disparities among European MSM. We conducted a secondary data analysis of the European Men-who-have-sex-with-men Internet Survey (EMIS) from 2017. We included a total of 98,600 participants living in 39 European countries. We used the Rainbow Index, a score given to countries based on their sexual and gender minority policies as the predictor of HIV diagnosis. We conducted adjusted random intercept and slope multi-level logistic regressions. In adjusted models, higher Rainbow Index scores was associated with lower predictive probabilities of diagnosed HIV, regardless of the number of condomless intercourse partners. The predictive probability of HIV diagnosis was also lower, regardless of severity of anxiety/depression, where the Rainbow Index score was better. Country-level policies interact with downstream sexual behaviours and anxiety/depression to structurally influence HIV diagnosis among MSM in Europe.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available