4.5 Article

Racial/ethnic and gender disparities in child protection decision-making: What role do stereotypes play?

Journal

CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT
Volume 127, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105579

Keywords

Child protection; Decision-making; Ethnic/racial disparities; Gender disparities; Stereotype content model; Intersectionality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A study investigated racial/ethnic and gender disparities in child protection decision-making and explored whether these disparities were mediated by stereotypes. Though no significant association between stereotypes and disparities was found, the study revealed that perceptions of morality impacted decision-making processes.
Background: A wide range of studies have revealed racial/ethnic and gender disparities in child protection decision-making.Objective: This study investigated whether disparities are mediated by stereotypes that professionals may hold, by applying the Stereotype Content Model (SCM) which suggests that stereotypes are formed by perceptions of sociability, morality, and competence. Participants and setting: 258 professionals (133 current staff and 125 trainees) from Colorado participated in the study.Methods: The study applied a 2 x 3 randomized experimental vignette design. Participants read a case in which the gender of the parent responsible for maltreatment (mother or father) and race/ ethnicity of the family (white, Black, or Latinx) varied.Results: A SEM model (CFI = .94, RMSEA = .05) with free parameters for trainees and current staff was estimated. No significant association between stereotypes and race/ethnicity and gender appeared. However, evidence for disparities emerged. In the trainee group, scores to decide for a supervision order were higher for white fathers, Black mothers, Latinx mothers, and Latinx fathers (beta = 0.18 to 0.25) compared to white mothers. Current staff provided larger risk scores for Black mothers and both Latinx parents (beta = 0.20 to 0.22) compared to the white mother, resulting in increased inclinations to decide for a supervision order (beta = 0.26). Lastly, negative perceptions of morality increased supervision order scores (beta =-0.55 to-0.36).Conclusions: Evidence for disparities in decision-making appeared, but the study could not confirm that these disparities were mediated by stereotypes. Furthermore, perceptions of morality seemed to impact decision-making processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available