4.5 Article

Family Aggression Screening Tool (FAST): Factor structure and psychometric properties of subscales

Journal

CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT
Volume 127, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105548

Keywords

Psychometric properties; Reliability; Validity; Family aggression; Intimate partner violence; Victimisation and child maltreatment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Family Aggression Screening Tool (FAST) in Brazil. The results indicate that FAST has good properties in terms of validity and reliability for the Brazilian population.
Background: The Family Aggression Screening Tool (FAST) is an instrument to screen for experiences of maltreatment using primarily pictorial representations, including direct victimisation and exposure to intimate partner violence. The initial psychometric properties of the FAST were reported in the original research in the United Kingdom.Objective: This research aimed to replicate and to extend the evaluation of the psychometric properties of FAST in Brazil. Participants and setting: Data consisted of 648 youth aged 11 to 17 years from public schools in Brazil.Method: We employed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and exploratory graphical analysis (EGA). Concurrent validity was supported by strong correlations between the FAST's emotional and physical victimisation subscales and Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) emotional and physical abuse subscales. Results: CFA resulted in a solution including second and first order factors, resembling the original structure. FAST's reliability was assessed both through internal consistency and test-retest, showing favorable coefficients. Conclusion: Our results suggest that FAST has good psychometric properties for the Brazilian population with respect to both its validity and reliability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available