4.8 Article

Income inequality, energy poverty, and energy efficiency: Who cause who and how?

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121622

Keywords

Energy efficiency; Income inequality; Energy poverty; Asymmetric and heterogeneous analysis; China; C33

Funding

  1. National Social Science Foundation of China [20VGQ003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Improving energy efficiency can simultaneously alleviate income inequality and energy poverty, with significant heterogeneity and asymmetry in the impacts. The government can reduce income inequality and energy poverty by enhancing technological evolution and support for green innovation.
Addressing income inequality and energy poverty have become priorities in China's policy agenda. To explore the impacts of energy efficiency on income inequality and energy poverty in China, this study constructs a dynamic panel model using a balanced panel dataset covering 30 provinces for the period 2004-2017. By applying the system-generalized method of moments (SYS-GMM), we estimate the role of energy efficiency and conduct a regional heterogeneous and asymmetric analysis. We also discuss the potential moderating effects in the relationship between energy efficiency and energy poverty as well as income inequality. The main findings show that (i) improved energy efficiency can simultaneously alleviate income inequality and energy poverty, (ii) significant heterogeneity and asymmetry exist in the impacts of energy efficiency on energy poverty and income inequality, and (iii) the government can alleviate income inequality and energy poverty by enhancing the contribution of energy efficiency through technological evolution and increased support for green innovation. Based on the above findings, this study proposes several policy implications to reduce income inequality and energy poverty.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available