4.5 Article

Effect of fermentation and malting on the microstructure and selected physicochemical properties of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) flour and biscuit

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE
Volume 70, Issue -, Pages 132-139

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2016.05.026

Keywords

Pearl millet; Malting; Fermentation; Physicochemical properties

Funding

  1. University Research Committee (URC) Fellowship of the University of Johannesburg
  2. National Research Foundation (NRF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the effect of fermentation and malting on selected physicochemical, textural and microstructural changes in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) flour and its resultant biscuit. Results obtained showed that both fermentation and malting significantly (p < 0.05) increased swelling capacity, oil and water absorption capacity, with a decrease in bulk density of the flours. The diffraction patterns on X-ray diffraction (XRD) showed slight increase in the crystallinity of the fermented and malted millet flours, while baking resulted in a reduced crystallinity of the biscuit samples. The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra showed changes and increases in the band intensities, while the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) studies revealed that while fermentation and malting changed the microstructure of the native flour from an irregular compact granular structure to a regular loose structure, baking induced a distorted honey-like comb structure to all the biscuit samples. Textural profile (hardness) also showed an increase in hardness from 5.30 N in the native biscuits to 15.85 and 29.31 N in the malted and fermented biscuit samples respectively. Conclusively, fermentation and malting modified and improved the physicochemical and possible nutritional properties of the flour and resultant biscuit. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available