4.7 Article

Too tired for a good deal: How customer fatigue shapes the performance of Pay-What-You-Want pricing

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH
Volume 144, Issue -, Pages 987-996

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.014

Keywords

Pay what you want; Pricing effort; Customer fatigue; Pricing attitude

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research investigates customers’ reactions to exchanges in retailing contexts where they have complete control over the final price. The study finds that despite customers’ positive attitudes towards participative pricing strategies, delegating price-setting control to customers can decrease purchase intentions and actual purchases. These effects are mediated by perceived pricing effort and moderated by customer fatigue level.
The current research investigates customers' reactions to exchanges where they are given complete control in determining the final price in retailing contexts. Specifically, the authors seek to understand how participative pricing mechanisms, such as Pay-What-You-Want (PWYW), influence pricing attitudes and customer purchases. We argue that, despite customers' favorable attitude toward such pricing strategies, the delegation of control to customers in the price-setting process can be costly for firms. In four studies, we demonstrate that PWYW enhances attitudes toward the pricing strategy but decreases purchase intentions and actual purchases. Furthermore, we isolate perceived pricing effort as the key underlying mechanism and identify customer fatigue level as a critical moderator. Our findings suggest that managers should implement PWYW only in situations where customers have the mental energy required to determine what they want to pay. The present research makes important theoretical contributions to existing literatures on participative pricing and customer fatigue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available