4.5 Article

Feasibility of analyzing frost-damaged and non-viable maize kernels based on near infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE
Volume 69, Issue -, Pages 145-150

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2016.02.018

Keywords

Seed damage; Viability; Near infrared spectroscopy; Discrimination

Funding

  1. Dabeinong Technology Group Co., Ltd.
  2. Dabeinong Young Scholars Program [1081-2413001]
  3. National Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research for Public Interest [201203052]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current detection methods for maize seed damage and viability assessment are usually time-consuming, tedious, and costly. In this investigation, near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), a nondestructive and rapid analytical method, was explored to analyze frost-damaged and non-viable seeds. Principal component analysis (PCA), partial least squares (PLS) and orthogonal linear discriminant analysis (OLDA) were combined to extract feature from near infrared (NIR) spectra. PLS + OLDA can extract difference characteristics of normal and frost-damaged seeds more efficiently than PCA + OLDA. Three classification algorithms were utilized and compared: Support vector machine (SVM), biomimetic pattern recognition (BPR), and mahalanobis distance (MD). BPR can classify normal and frost-damaged seeds better and achieved the highest average accuracy of 97%. Discrimination model of viable and non-viable seeds in frost-damaged seeds based on SVM, BPR and MD were built and achieved accuracies of 94%, 97.25% and 89.5% respectively. BPR model yielded the most correct value in predicting germination rate of validation set, and improved the germination rate of validation set dramatically from 27.5% to 100% by screening out non-viable seeds. NIRS and chemometrics as demonstrated in this paper can provide a novel method which can assess and improve quality of maize seed quickly and inexpensively. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available