4.7 Article

The effect of gender stereotypes on artificial intelligence recommendations

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH
Volume 141, Issue -, Pages 50-59

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.007

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence (AI); AI agent; Gender stereotypes; AI recommendations

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education of the Re-public of Korea
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2021S1A5B5A16075775]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2021S1A5B5A16075775] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the impact of gender stereotypes on evaluating AI recommendations, finding that participants' perceptions were influenced by the gender of the AI agent and product type. Participants tended to have more positive attitudes towards AI recommendations when gender of the AI agent matched the type of product being recommended.
This study explores the effects of gender stereotypes on evaluating artificial intelligence (AI) recommendations. We predict that gender stereotypes will affect human-AI interactions, resulting in somewhat different persuasive effects of AI recommendations for utilitarian vs. hedonic products. We found that participants in the male AI agent condition gave higher competence scores than in the female AI agent condition. Contrariwise, perceived warmth was higher in the female AI agent condition than in the male condition. More importantly, a significant interaction effect between AI gender and product type was found, suggesting that participants showed more positive attitudes toward the AI recommendations when the male AI recommended a utilitarian (vs. hedonic) product. Conversely, a hedonic product was evaluated more positively when advised by the female (vs. male) AI agent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available