4.7 Article

The Ambivalent Students' Cognition to Be English Teachers for Young Learners: A Longitudinal Study

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.818883

Keywords

pre-service teachers; cognition; teaching English for young learners course; EFL context; higher education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study longitudinally analyzed university students' cognition in learning an English for young learners (EYL) course. The findings indicate a significant change in pre-service teachers' cognition, such as their motivation, perception, and belief. It was observed that students' interest in teaching English to young learners and the duration of studying EYL teaching knowledge do not necessarily guarantee their conviction to pursue a teaching profession.
This longitudinal study analyzed university students' cognition in learning an English for young learners (EYL) course. A qualitative method was used to get the data from 28 students who took the tiered EYL courses, EYL 1, EYL 2, and EYL 3, at a private university by giving them open-ended questionnaires for three semesters, or one and a half years. Semi-structured interviews with those 28 students were also used as the triangulation data at the end of each semester. The findings indicate a very extreme change in pre-service teachers' cognition, such as motivation, perception, and belief. At the end of their lecture, students initially interested in learning English for young learners did not want to become EYL teachers. On the other hand, students who enrolled in the EYL course for non-academic reasons wanted to have a profession as an EYL teacher after completing the EYL courses. It proves that students' interest in teaching English to young learners and the length of time spent studying EYL teaching knowledge do not assure those pre-service teachers are increasingly convinced to have a teaching profession.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available