4.7 Article

Nanomaterial based analytical methods for breast cancer biomarker detection

Journal

MATERIALS TODAY ADVANCES
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtadv.2022.100219

Keywords

Breast cancer; Biomarker; Nanomaterials; Blood; Biosensor

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22174163]
  2. Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Plan Project, China [2019TP1001]
  3. Innovation Driven Project of Central South University [2020CX002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Female breast cancer is a major global health issue, with high incidence and mortality rates. Detecting biomarkers in the blood using nanomaterials has shown promising results and offers a noninvasive approach that complements traditional imaging and immunohistochemistry methods.
Female breast cancer is the leading cause of global cancer incidence and the fifth leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide in 2020. Breast cancer can be categorized into different subtypes according to the expression of biomarkers such as estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). The analysis of these biomarkers is also indispensable for systemic treatment decisions in breast cancer. In this review, we summarized recent progress for the detection of breast cancer biomarkers in blood utilizing nanomaterials. The attractive physical, chemical, optical and electronic properties of various nanomaterials facilitated the detection of these biomarkers and improved the performance of the detection. The detection of biomarkers in blood is relatively noninvasive and can provide useful biological information that is complementary to imaging examination and immunohistochemistry. (c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available