4.7 Review

A comprehensive overview of geopolymer composites: A bibliometric analysis and literature review

Journal

CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00830

Keywords

Geopolymer composites; Scientometric analysis; Compressive strength; Microstructure; Durability

Funding

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad Campus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cement, a key component of concrete, requires significant energy for production and emits CO2, leading to efforts to develop an alternative binder. Geopolymer composite (GPC) is proposed as a clean alternative for sustainable construction. A scientometric analysis identified key data on GPC research and highlighted research gaps and concerns.
Cement is the main component of concrete, a widely used building material. Cement production requires substantial energy, exhausts natural resources, and causes CO2 emissions. Efforts are being undertaken to develop a concrete binder instead of cement. Geopolymer composite (GPC) is developed as a potential new building material, offering a clean alternative for construction sustainability. This study accumulated extensive bibliometric data on GPC from the Scopus database and conducted a scientometric analysis employing an appropriate software. The leading sources of publications, highly used keywords in the published articles, writers and papers with the highest citations, and active regions were all identified in the scientometric analysis. Manual reviews are unable to deal with the vast bibliometric data effectively. Additionally, this study covers the most crucial research concerns and shortcomings in existing research about GPC adoption and application. Lastly, further research guidelines are suggested. The scientometric review will assist academics from various states to exchange innovative ideas and expertize, encourage collaborative research, and develop joint ventures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available