4.7 Article

Effect of reinforcement on the response of continuous steel-concrete composite beams

Journal

CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e00929

Keywords

Composite beam; Reinforcement; Flexural behavior; Numerical analysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51978549]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a comprehensive assessment on the inelastic behavior of continuous steel-concrete composite beams, focusing on the effect of reinforcement in the slab. The results show that using carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) reinforcement is more effective in reducing crack width in the concrete slab over the center support compared to glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) or steel reinforcement. The reinforcement has little influence on the ultimate response at midspan but significantly affects the response at the center support.
This paper presents a comprehensive assessment on inelastic behavior of continuous steel-concrete composite (SCC) beams, focusing on the effect of reinforcement in slab. A finite element model is formulated and verified against laboratory tests. Numerical assessment is conducted on two-span SCC beams with various reinforcement types and areas. The results indicate that using carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) reinforcement is more effective in reducing the crack width in concrete slab over the center support than using glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) or steel reinforcement. The reinforcement hardly influences the ultimate response at midspan but markedly affects that at the center support. The ultimate load of SCC beams with steel reinforcement is close to that with CFRP reinforcement while higher than that with GFRP reinforcement. At ultimate, CFRP reinforcement leads to greater support moment but substantially lower moment redistribution while GFRP reinforcement results in lower moment but comparable moment redistribution, when compared to steel reinforcement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available