4.7 Article

Alternative clay bricks inspired from termite mound biomimicry

Journal

CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e00977

Keywords

Termite mound; Biomimicry; Clay bricks; Polysaccharides; Cassava paste

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to extensive pollution in material production, construction, and demolition processes, there is a global need to find alternative materials to reduce environmental impact. This study draws inspiration from termite techniques to develop a material for constructing naturally cemented mound structures. The material consists of a mixture of soil particles and termite saliva containing polysaccharides and cellulase enzymes. Clay bricks produced using this technique showed promising compressive strength, outperforming burnt clay bricks.
As the world is witnessing vast pollution during material production, construction and demolition processes of buildings there is a need to seek for alternative materials that will reduce the environmental impact. The present study borrows inspirations from termite's technique to create a material for constructing a naturally cemented mound structure. The studied termite mound was built from a mix of soil particles and termites saliva containing mucopolysaccharides and cellulase enzyme that digests cellulose into beta-glucose or shorter polysaccharides and oligosaccharides. These polysaccharides are found to be a source of soil stabilization and gluing property. In the process to mimic termites' activities clay bricks were produced from a mix of clay soil and cassava flour in a form of hot cassava paste as a source of polysaccharides at 1.5%, 3%, 4.5% and 6% weight of soil. Brick samples created presented an optimal value at 1.5% cassava flour with compressive strength higher than that of burnt clay bricks at 4.28 MPa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available