4.5 Article

New Staging Model for Radiation-based Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment: A National Multicenter Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL HEPATOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 341-349

Publisher

XIA & HE PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.14218/JCTH.2022.00002

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Radiotherapy; Stereotactic body radiotherapy; Staging system; Overall survival

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aims to create a new staging model for prognostic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) classification based on radiotherapy. The modified staging model shows excellent ability to differentiate patients based on different stages, providing an alternative for clinical radiation oncologists.
Background and Aims: The study aimed to create a new staging model for radiotherapy-based treatment for prognostic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) classification. Methods: The training cohort comprised 658 patients receiving stereotactic body radiotherapy and external validation cohort comprised 533 patients receiving three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. We established a modified staging system as follows: stage I, solitary nodule without macrovascular invasion, or 2-3 nodules no more than 3.0 cm apart, and performance status (PS) 0-2 (Ia: ALBI-1 grade; Ib: ALBI-2 or 3 grade); stage II: 2-3 nodules with any one nodule more than 3.0-cm apart, or >= 4 nodules, and performance status 0-2 (IIa: ALBI-1 grade; IIb: ALBI-2 grade); stage III: macrovascular invasion, regional lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis, and performance status 0-2 (IIIa: ALBI-1 grade; IIIb: ALBI-2 grade); stage IV: performance status 3-4, or performance status 0-2 with ALBI-3 grade. We analyzed longterm overall survival based on different stages. Results: The staging model showed an excellent ability to discriminate patients according to four stages and seven substages with notably different curves in the training and validation cohort. The median survival decreased from stages I to IV with 63.0 months in stage I (not reached in Ia, and 53.0 months in Ib), 24.0 months in stage II (28.0 months in IIa, and 22.0 months in IIb), 11.0 months in stage III (18.0 months in IIIa, and 9.0 months in IIIb), and less than 9.0 months in stage IV in the training cohort. Conclusions: The modified staging model may provide an alternative for clinical radiation oncologists.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available