4.6 Review

Optimizing Foundational Therapies in Patients With HFrEF How Do We Translate These Findings Into Clinical Care?

Journal

JACC-BASIC TO TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages 504-517

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2021.10.018

Keywords

beta-blockers; mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists; sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors; angiotensin receptor- neprilys in inhibitor

Funding

  1. AstraZeneca Canada
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim
  3. Fonds de Recherche Sante Quebec (FRSQ) Junior 1 clinician scholars program
  4. Canada Institute for Health Research (CIHR) [175095]
  5. Roche Diagnostics
  6. Boeringer Ingelheim
  7. Novartis
  8. Takeda
  9. Amarin
  10. Amgen
  11. AstraZeneca
  12. Bayer
  13. Bristol Myers Squibb
  14. Eli Lilly
  15. EOCI Pharmacomm Ltd
  16. HLS Therapeutics
  17. Janssen
  18. Merck
  19. Novo Nordisk
  20. Pfizer
  21. PhaseBio
  22. Sanofi
  23. Sun Pharmaceuticals
  24. Toronto Knowledge Translation Working Group
  25. Abbott
  26. Edwards
  27. Daiichi Sankyo
  28. oehringer Ingelheim
  29. CSL Behring
  30. Ferring Pharmaceuticals
  31. Afimmune
  32. Cardax
  33. CellProthera
  34. Cereno Scientific
  35. Chiesi
  36. Eisai
  37. Ethicon
  38. Forest Laboratories
  39. Fractyl
  40. Garmin
  41. Idorsia
  42. Ironwood
  43. Ischemix
  44. Lexicon
  45. Lilly
  46. Medtronic
  47. MyoKardia
  48. NirvaMed
  49. Owkin
  50. PLx Pharma
  51. Regeneron
  52. Roche
  53. Synaptic
  54. Medicines Company
  55. 89Bio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have a high risk of adverse outcomes. It is crucial to initiate and titrate guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) to reduce morbidity and mortality. Clinical practice guidelines emphasize the need for early initiation of therapies that have cardiovascular benefit. However, many barriers exist in the initiation and optimization of GDMT.
Given the high risk of adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), there is an urgent need for the initiation and titration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) that can reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality. Clinical practice guidelines are now emphasizing the need for early and rapid initiation of therapies that have cardiovascular benefit. Recognizing that there are many barriers to GDMT initiation and optimization, health care providers should aim to introduce the 4 pillars of quadruple therapy now recommended by most clinical practice guidelines: angiotensin receptor???neprilysin inhibitors, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium???glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors. A large proportion of patients with HFrEF do not have clinical contraindi-cations to GDMT but are not treated with these therapies. Early initiation of low-dose combination therapy should be tolerated by most patients. However, patient-related factors such as hemodynamics, frailty, and laboratory values will need consideration for maximum tolerated GDMT. GDMT initiation in acute heart failure hospitalization represents another important avenue to improve use of GDMT. Finally, removal of therapies that do not have clear cardiovascular benefit should be considered to lower polypharmacy and reduce the risk of adverse side effects. Future prospective studies aimed at guiding optimal implementation of quadruple therapy are warranted to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with HFrEF. (J Am Coll Cardiol Basic Trans Science 2022;7:504???517) ?? 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available