4.7 Article

Biopolypropylene-Based Wood Plastic Composites Reinforced with Mango Peel Flour and Compatibilized with an Environmentally Friendly Copolymer from Itaconic Acid

Journal

ACS APPLIED POLYMER MATERIALS
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages 4398-4410

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsapm.2c00373

Keywords

polymer composites; biopolymers; reinforcements; mango peel fl our; compatibilization

Funding

  1. MCIN/AEI [PID2020-116496RB-C22]
  2. Generalitat Valenciana-GVA [AICO/2021/025]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work successfully developed biopolypropylene/mango peel flour composites with improved compatibility and enhanced properties through the use of compatibilizer and cross-linker.
This work reports on the successful development of biopolypropylene/ mango peel flour (bioPP/MPF) composites using extrusion and injection molding processes. The compatibility between bioPP and MPF is improved through the use of PPg-IA (3 phr) as a compatibilizer (which is prepared by reactive extrusion REX) and dicumyl peroxide (DCP) (1 phr) as a cross-linker. The mechanical, morphological, thermal, thermomechanical, chemical, colorimetric, water absorption, and flowability properties are characterized and analyzed. The results show that MPF (30 wt %) compatibilized with PP-g-IA and DCP increased the stiffness of bioPP in terms of Young's modulus values. Elongation at break also shows very promising results, with a maximum value of almost 30% for the bioPP/MPF/PP-g-IA/DCP sample. PP-g-IA and DCP seem to exert a synergetic effect. Thermal stability is also improved as a result of these additives, as well as crystallinity, which is increased due to an heterogeneous nucleation phenomenon, enhanced by a higher dispersion of MPF particles in the matrix. Moreover, the excellent mechanical results are verified in FESEM images, where a very narrow gap between the MPF particles and the bioPP matrix is appreciated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available