4.6 Review

Management of risks substances and sustainable development

Journal

APPLIED WATER SCIENCE
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13201-021-01562-7

Keywords

Critical situational; Waste management; Sustainable development; Human health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sustainable improvement is related to key variables that contribute to stable and secure positions. Hazardous substances and unsuitable soils have become one of the most important issues of insecurity for masculinity. Various countries have been monitoring unsafe substances and hazardous products. Although the safe evacuation of hazardous wastes has been an ongoing issue, research on the contrasting effects of dangerously bad backgrounds on anthropological well-being and conditions has determined that the unsafe overflow group will continue to be addressed during the current highest protection programs.
Sustainable improvement is related to several key variables that count as solid and secure positions. Currently, the group of hazardous substances and inappropriate soils has created one of the most important issues of insecurity against masculinity. Consequently, unsafe substances and hazardous products have been unusually monitored by various countries. Although the safe evacuation of hazardous wastes has consistently remained an issue, the increase in collections and overall estimates of the oppressive situation created in inapplicable periods and the progress of our data and thinking about the contrasting effects of dangerously bad backgrounds on anthropological well-being and conditions has predetermined that the unsafe overflow group will continue during the period of the highest protection programs at the present time. In order to conduct this research, the management of hazardous substances and unsafe goods that are considered as wasteful waste will be properly portrayed in this research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available