4.7 Article

Physiological and Biochemical Parameters of Leaves for Evaluation of the Potato Yield

Journal

AGRICULTURE-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture12060757

Keywords

Solanum tuberosum L.; arid climate; adaptation; morphological; physiological and biochemical parameters; yield

Categories

Funding

  1. [1021060107217-0-1.6.19]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the morphological, physiological, and biochemical parameters of potato leaves to evaluate yield. It found that different ripeness groups of potato varieties were affected differently by temperature and soil moisture. The findings are important for increasing productivity and improving potato quality.
The aim of the study was to investigate the morphological, physiological, and biochemical parameters of leaves to evaluate the yield of Solanum tuberosum L. We conducted 3-year experiments with 24 varieties of potatoes, differing in ripeness groups (early ripening, mid-early ripening and mid ripening). Plant height, linear dimensions, number of stomata per unit leaf area as well as content of pigments, proline, membrane lipids and proteins, and the level of lipid per oxidation in the leaves of each variety were investigated. A 3D modeling method showed the yield of early varieties negatively correlated with an increase in temperatures (R = -0.97). The soil moisture content positively correlated with the yield of medium-early varieties (R = 0.97). The soil moisture content and the tuber numbers in mid-season varieties had a negative correlation (R = -0.96). The regulation mechanisms of processes in cells depend on the ripening time of a variety. In order to increase productivity and to improve the potato quality, it is necessary to take into account the peculiarities of the regional climatic conditions and use the varieties of a certain ripening group. Our data refine the understanding of the relationship between the potato above-ground mass and the yield of tubers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available