Journal
AGRICULTURE-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture12030405
Keywords
microbiome; microbial diversity; uterine infection; metritis; puerperium
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Knowledge of vaginal and uterine microbiomes is crucial for preventing uterine diseases and understanding their development. A study on dairy cows found that cows with pathological puerperium had reduced bacterial diversity and higher occurrence of certain bacterial genera (such as Fusobacteria spp., Bacteroides spp., and Helcococcus spp.). The study also observed correlation between bacterial occurrences in the vagina and uterus, and a lower incidence of coagulase-negative staphylococci in cows with puerperal disorders.
Knowledge of how vaginal and uterine microbiomes are composed is essential to prevent uterine diseases and to understand their pathogenesis. For this purpose, 50 dairy cows were involved in a prospective trial. Cows were clinically examined and vaginal and uterine swabs were taken (day 2, 4, 6 and 14 p.p.), followed up by clinical examination on day 21 +/- 1 and 41 +/- 1. All samples (n = 364) were analyzed with cultural bacteriological methods and bacteria were identified by MALDI-TOF MS. In animals with a pathological puerperium, bacterial diversity was reduced and the genera Fusobacteria spp., Bacteroides spp. and Helcococcus spp. occurred significantly more frequently. By contrast, other well-known uterine pathogens such as Escherichia spp. and Trueperella pyogenes did not show significant differences between healthy and diseased cattle. Bacterial occurrences in the vagina and the uterus were sometimes correlated. Cows that suffered from puerperal disorders showed a significantly lower incidence of coagulase- negative staphylococci even before symptoms occurred. This may point towards a protective role of the vaginal microbiome. In addition, we discuss several shortcomings in calving hygiene that might have contributed to the high percentage of puerperal disorders on the study farm (58.7%).
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available