4.6 Article

Use of Image-Guided Surgical Navigation during Resection of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer

Journal

LIFE-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/life12050645

Keywords

image-guided surgical navigation; locally recurrent rectal cancer

Funding

  1. [NKI2016-8162]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This exploratory study evaluates the use of image-guided surgical navigation during resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). The study shows that surgical navigation is safe and feasible, providing accurate surgical guidance during the procedure.
Surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) presents several challenges, which is why the percentage of inadequate resections of these tumors is high. In this exploratory study, we evaluate the use of image-guided surgical navigation during resection of LRRC. Patients who were scheduled to undergo surgical resection of LRRC who were deemed by the multidisciplinary team to be at a high risk of inadequate tumor resection were selected to undergo surgical navigation. The risk of inadequate surgery was further determined by the proximity of the tumor to critical anatomical structures. Workflow characteristics of the surgical navigation procedure were evaluated, while the surgical outcome was determined by the status of the resection margin. In total, 20 patients were analyzed. For all procedures, surgical navigation was completed successfully and demonstrated to be accurate, while no complications related to the surgical navigation were discerned. Radical resection was achieved in 14 cases (70%). In five cases (25%), a tumor-positive resection margin (R1) was anticipated during surgery, as extensive radical resection was determined to be compromised. These patients all received intraoperative brachytherapy. In one case (5%), an unexpected R1 resection was performed. Surgical navigation during resection of LRRC is thus safe and feasible and enables accurate surgical guidance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available