4.6 Review

The R Language: An Engine for Bioinformatics and Data Science

Journal

LIFE-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/life12050648

Keywords

R; statistics; bioinformatics; programming; CRAN; data science

Funding

  1. CARISBO Foundation, under the Bando Ricerca Medica e Alta Tecnologia 2021 [2021.0167]
  2. University of Bologna, ALMArie CURIE 2021 initiative
  3. Italian Ministry of University and Research, under the PON Ricerca e Innovazione 2014-2020 program
  4. CINECA consortium [HP10CJH90B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviews the development of the R programming language from its inception to the present day, describing its current features and capabilities, as well as its relationship with other programming languages. It also provides a detailed introduction to the major tools and applications of R, and discusses its role in science.
The R programming language is approaching its 30th birthday, and in the last three decades it has achieved a prominent role in statistics, bioinformatics, and data science in general. It currently ranks among the top 10 most popular languages worldwide, and its community has produced tens of thousands of extensions and packages, with scopes ranging from machine learning to transcriptome data analysis. In this review, we provide an historical chronicle of how R became what it is today, describing all its current features and capabilities. We also illustrate the major tools of R, such as the current R editors and integrated development environments (IDEs), the R Shiny web server, the R methods for machine learning, and its relationship with other programming languages. We also discuss the role of R in science in general as a driver for reproducibility. Overall, we hope to provide both a complete snapshot of R today and a practical compendium of the major features and applications of this programming language.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available