4.6 Article

Genetic Workup for Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy: A Retrospective Single-Site Experience Covering 15 Years

Journal

LIFE-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/life12030402

Keywords

Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease; neuropathy; genetic; phenotype

Funding

  1. Ministero della Salute
  2. Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetic and Maternal Infantile Sciences (DINOGMI)
  3. MIUR Department of Excellence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents the results of a CMT clinic in Italy, showing that CMT1A is the most common subtype and HSPB1 and MPZ genes are related to a distinct phenotype.
Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease is the most commonly inherited neurological disorder. This study includes patients affected by CMT during regular follow-ups at the CMT clinic in Genova, a neuromuscular university center in the northwest of Italy, with the aim of describing the genetic distribution of CMT subtypes in our cohort and reporting a peculiar phenotype. Since 2004, 585 patients (447 index cases) have been evaluated at our center, 64.9% of whom have a demyelinating neuropathy and 35.1% of whom have an axonal neuropathy. A genetic diagnosis was achieved in 66% of all patients, with the following distribution: CMT1A (48%), HNPP (14%), CMT1X (13%), CMT2A (5%), and P0-related neuropathies (7%), accounting all together for 87% of all the molecularly defined neuropathies. Interestingly, we observe a peculiar phenotype with initial exclusive lower limb involvement as well as lower limb involvement that is maintained over time, which we have defined as a strictly length-dependent phenotype. Most patients with this clinical presentation shared variants in either HSPB1 or MPZ genes. The identification of distinctive phenotypes such as this one may help to address genetic diagnosis. In conclusion, we describe our diagnostic experiences as a multidisciplinary outpatient clinic, combining a gene-by-gene approach or targeted gene panels based on clinical presentation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available