4.5 Article

New Low-Cost Ceramic Microfiltration Membranes for Bacteria Removal

Journal

MEMBRANES
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/membranes12050490

Keywords

microfiltration; ceramic membranes; natural resources; Escherichia coli; Staphylococcus aureus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports on the development of new ceramic microfiltration membranes made from local inexpensive raw materials, which have the advantages of high efficiency and low cost. These membranes show promising performance in rejecting bacteria and have potential applications in water treatment and household use.
Safe water provision in low-income countries is constrained by limited financial resources, and the problem is worsened during natural disasters. Thus, there is a need to develop efficient low-cost technologies for point-of-use water treatment. This work reports on the development of new ceramic microfiltration membranes made from mixtures of inexpensive raw materials available locally (kaolin, bentonite and limestone) and their efficiency in rejecting bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Thermogravimetric analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, mercury intrusion porosimetry, flexural strength and water uptake were used to characterize the raw materials and membranes. The addition of limestone in the membrane fabrication increased the pore size, the porosity and, thus, the permeability of the membranes but at the expense of the rejection performance. Among the different compositions studied, the membrane made of 83% kaolin, 10% bentonite and 7% limestone showed the best performance compromise with water permeability of 566 L center dot h(-1)center dot m(-2)center dot bar(-1) and 100% rejection of both Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. These new low-cost microfiltration membranes are expected to have potential applications in water treatment and household applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available