4.7 Article

Modulation of FAK and Src adhesion signaling occurs independently of adhesion complex composition

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 212, Issue 3, Pages 349-364

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201508080

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [092015]
  2. Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund award [097820]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council studentship from the Systems Biology Doctoral Training Centre
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  5. University of Manchester Strategic Fund
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [1087621] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Integrin adhesion complexes (IACs) form mechanochemical connections between the extracellular matrix and actin cytoskeleton and mediate phenotypic responses via posttranslational modifications. Here, we investigate the modularity and robustness of the IAC network to pharmacological perturbation of the key IAC signaling components focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and Src. FAK inhibition using AZ13256675 blocked FAKY(397) phosphorylation but did not alter IAC composition, as reported by mass spectrometry. IAC composition was also insensitive to Src inhibition using AZD0530 alone or in combination with FAK inhibition. In contrast, kinase inhibition substantially reduced phosphorylation within IACs, cell migration and proliferation. Furthermore using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching, we found that FAK inhibition increased the exchange rate of a phosphotyrosine (pY) reporter (dSH2) at IACs. These data demonstrate that kinase-dependent signal propagation through IACs is independent of gross changes in IAC composition. Together, these findings demonstrate a general separation between the composition of IACs and their ability to relay pY-dependent signals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available