4.7 Article

Assessing the Effect of Modified Clay on the Toxicity of Karenia mikimotoi Using Marine Medaka (Oryzias melastigma) as a Model Organism

Journal

TOXICS
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxics10030105

Keywords

modified clay; Karenia mikimotoi; harmful algal bloom; marine medaka; marine toxicity tests

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41976148]
  2. Key R&D project of Shandong Province [2019JZZY010808]
  3. Taishan Program of Shandong Province of 2019

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The blooms of toxic dinoflagellate Karenia mikimotoi can pose a threat to the survival of marine life, but modified clay (MC) has shown promise as a method for controlling harmful algal blooms. In this study, it was found that MC treatment can rapidly reduce the toxicity of K. mikimotoi by reducing the density of intact algae cells and hemolytic toxicity, thereby mitigating the damage to fish gills and reducing mortality.
Blooms of the toxic dinoflagellate Karenia mikimotoi could threaten the survival of marine life, and modified clay (MC) is considered a promising method for the control of harmful algal blooms. Here, using marine medaka as the model organism, the toxicity of K. mikimotoi before and after MC disposal was investigated. The results showed that only a certain density of intact K. mikimotoi cells could cause obvious damage to fish gills and lead to rapid death. A systematic analysis of morphology, physiology, and molecular biology parameters revealed that the fish gills exhibited structural damage, oxidative damage, osmotic regulation impairment, immune response activation, and signal transduction enhancement. MC can flocculate K. mikimotoi rapidly in water and reduce its toxicity by reducing the density of intact algae cells and hemolytic toxicity. The results indicate that MC is an effective and safe method for controlling K. mikimotoi blooms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available