4.6 Article

Kineverse: A Symbolic Articulation Model Framework for Model-Agnostic Mobile Manipulation

Journal

IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 3372-3379

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2022.3146515

Keywords

Kinematics; mobile manipulation; service robotics

Categories

Funding

  1. BrainLinks-BrainTools Center of the University of Freiburg

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article introduces a novel framework that uses symbolic mathematical expressions to model articulated structures, including robots and objects, in a unified and extensible manner. With this framework, robots can execute abstract instructions and solve common robotics tasks.
Service robots in the future need to execute abstract instructions such as fetch the milk from the fridge. To translate such instructions into actionable plans, robots require in-depth background knowledge. With regards to interactions with doors and drawers, robots require articulation models that they can use for state estimation and motion planning. Existing frameworks model articulated connections as abstract concepts such as prismatic, or revolute, but do not provide a parameterized model of these connections for computation. In this letter, we introduce a novel framework that uses symbolic mathematical expressions to model articulated structures- robots and objects alike - in a unified and extensible manner. We provide a theoretical description of this framework, and the operations that are supported by its models, and introduce an architecture to exchange our models in robotic applications, making them as flexible as any other environmental observation. To demonstrate the utility of our approach, we employ our practical implementation Kineverse for solving common robotics tasks from state estimation and mobile manipulation, and use it further in real-world mobile robot manipulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available