Journal
BIOLOGY-BASEL
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biology11030398
Keywords
lumbar spine biomechanics; wearable sensors; IMU technology; lumbar microdiscectomy; spine biomechanics
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The recurrence rate after lumbar spine disc surgeries is estimated to be 5-15%. Lumbar spine flexion of more than 10 degrees is mentioned as the most harmful load to the operated disc level that could lead to recurrence during the first six postoperative weeks. This study used wearable sensors technology to quantify flexions during daily living following such surgeries for six weeks postoperatively. The results showed that patients had a 30% normal lumbar motion after the first postoperative week, which increased to almost 75% at the end of the sixth week.
Simple Summary The recurrence rate after lumbar spine disc surgeries is estimated to be 5-15%. Lumbar spine flexion of more than 10 degrees is mentioned in the literature as the most harmful load to the operated disc level that could lead to recurrence during the first six postoperative weeks. The purpose of this study is to quantify flexions during daily living following such surgeries, for six weeks postoperatively, using wearable sensors technology. These data determine the patients' kinematic pattern, reflecting a high-risk factor for pathology recurrence. The operated patients were measured to have 30% normal lumbar motion after the first postoperative week, while they were restored to almost 75% at the end of the sixth, respectively. Further in vitro studies should be carried out using these data to identify if such kinematic patterns could lead to pathology recurrence. Background: The recurrence rate of lumbar spine microdiscectomies (rLSMs) is estimated to be 5-15%. Lumbar spine flexion (LSF) of more than 10 degrees is mentioned as the most harmful load to the intervertebral disc that could lead to recurrence during the first six postoperative weeks. The purpose of this study is to quantify LSFs, following LSM, at the period of six weeks postoperatively. Methods: LSFs were recorded during the daily activities of 69 subjects for 24 h twice per week, using Inertial Measurement Units (IMU). Results: The mean number of more than 10 degrees of LSFs per hour were: 41.3/h during the 1st postoperative week (P.W.) (29.9% healthy subjects-H.S.), 2nd P.W. 60.1/h (43.5% H.S.), 3rd P.W. 74.2/h (53.7% H.S.), 4th P.W. 82.9/h (60% H.S.), 5th P.W. 97.3/h (70.4% H.S.) and 6th P.W. 105.5/h (76.4% H.S.). Conclusions: LSFs constitute important risk factors for rLDH. Our study records the lumbar spine kinematic pattern of such patients for the first time during their daily activities. Patients' data report less sagittal plane movements than healthy subjects. In vitro studies should be carried out, replicating our results to identify if such a kinematic pattern could cause rLDH. Furthermore, IMU biofeedback capabilities could protect patients from such harmful movements.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available