4.6 Review

Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) Scaffolds for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: A Systematic Review of Animal Models

Journal

BIOLOGY-BASEL
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biology11050706

Keywords

neural repair; biomaterial; PHA-polyhydroxyalkanoate; peripheral nervous system-PNS

Categories

Funding

  1. ANID Agencia Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo de Chile/Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico [FONDECYT 11190300]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) scaffolds show promising potential in promoting peripheral nerve regeneration, and the incorporation of additives appears to enhance nerve regeneration. However, standardized experimentation on animals is currently lacking in the reviewed studies, making it necessary to follow guidelines, improve study design, and enhance research quality.
Simple Summary Currently, polymeric biomaterials are the choice for the design of scaffolds for the regeneration of peripheral nerves. Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) is a polymer belonging to the class of polyesters that are produced naturally in nature by microorganisms. To gain a better understanding of the efficacy of therapeutic approaches involving PHB scaffolds for peripheral nerve regeneration, we conducted a systematic review of the literature with the aim of discussing the current knowledge of PHB scaffolds applied to nerve regeneration. The use of PHB as a biomaterial to prepare tubular scaffolds for nerve regeneration was shown to be promising. The incorporation of additives appears to be a trend that improves nerve regeneration. In the last two decades, artificial scaffolds for nerve regeneration have been produced using a variety of polymers. Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) is a natural polyester that can be easily processed and offer several advantages; hence, the purpose of this review is to provide a better understanding of the efficacy of therapeutic approaches involving PHB scaffolds in promoting peripheral nerve regeneration following nerve dissection in animal models. A systematic literature review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. The revised databases were: Pub-Med/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Direct, EMBASE, and SCOPUS. Sixteen studies were included in this review. Different animal models and nerves were studied. Extension of nerve gaps reconnected by PHB scaffolds and the time periods of analysis were varied. The additives included in the scaffolds, if any, were growth factors, neurotrophins, other biopolymers, and neural progenitor cells. The analysis of the quality of the studies revealed good quality in general, with some aspects that could be improved. The analysis of the risk of bias revealed several weaknesses in all studies. The use of PHB as a biomaterial to prepare tubular scaffolds for nerve regeneration was shown to be promising. The incorporation of additives appears to be a trend that improves nerve regeneration. One of the main weaknesses of the reviewed articles was the lack of standardized experimentation on animals. It is recommended to follow the currently available guidelines to improve the design, avoid the risk of bias, maximize the quality of studies, and enhance translationality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available