Journal
FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.849942
Keywords
chronic total occlusion (CTO); chronic coronary syndrome (CCS); ischemic heart disease; complex PCI; coronary artery disease; percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with chronic total occluded coronary arteries (CTO). The results showed that fully revascularized patients had a more cost-efficient treatment. However, confirmation in a randomized controlled trial is needed due to potential residual confounding after adjustment.
BackgroundRevascularization of patients with chronic total occluded coronary arteries (CTO) is recommended if they have symptoms despite medical treatment. The cost-effectiveness of treatment with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was investigated in this cohort study. Materials and MethodsThe study was designed as a cohort study enrolling all patients undergoing PCI for a CTO in the Central Region of Denmark and recorded in the EUROCTO database. Major adverse cardio- and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and admissions for cardiac symptoms were collected in the Western Denmark Heart Registry and through medical Journal Audits. Exposure was defined as successful revascularization of all CTO lesions compared with having one or more remaining CTOs after PCI attempt(s). Cost-effectiveness was evaluated as the net benefit (NB) at the patient level 3 years after treatment and through cost-effectiveness planes. The cost was defined as the cumulative cost of the index procedure and admissions due to MACCE and cardiac symptoms. Effectiveness was defined as the difference in MACCE for the primary analysis and the difference in death and symptomatic admissions for the secondary. ResultsBetween 2009 and 2019, 441 patients with >= 3 years of follow-up were treated with PCI for at least one CTO lesion (342 in the successful arm and 99 in the unsuccessful arm). The technical success rate was 85.4%. In total, 155 MACCE and 184 symptomatic admissions occurred in the follow-up period. The mean total cost was EUR 11.719 (11.034; 12.406) in the successful group vs. EUR 13.565 (11.899; 15,231) (p = 0.02) in the unsuccessful group. Net-benefit was EUR 1.846 (64; 3,627) after successful revascularization for MACCE. The adjusted analysis found an NB of EUR 1,481 (-118; 3,079). Bootstrap estimates showed cost-effectiveness planes in favor of successful revascularization. ConclusionPatients fully revascularized for all CTO lesions had a more cost-efficient treatment. However, results need confirmation in a randomized controlled trial due to the risk of residual confounding after adjustment.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available