4.6 Review

Alcohol Septal Ablation or Septal Myectomy? An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Septal Reduction Therapy for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy

Journal

FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.900469

Keywords

hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy; alcohol septal ablation; septal myectomy; meta-analysis; systematic review

Funding

  1. Youth Scientific Research Program of Guangdong Medical University [GDMUM2020024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of alcohol septal ablation (ASA) and septal myectomy (SM) for treating hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. The results show that there is no significant difference in postoperative mortality between ASA and SM patients, but ASA is associated with slightly lower reduction in left ventricular outflow tract pressure gradient and postoperative improvement in cardiac function compared to SM. Additionally, ASA is associated with higher risk of pacemaker implantation and reoperation. The choice of surgical plan should be made through multidisciplinary discussions considering the patients' wishes and clinical situation.
Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of alcohol septal ablation (ASA) and septal myectomy (SM) for the treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Methods: We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CBM databases for observational research articles related to ASA and SM published from the establishment of the databases to November 2021. All ultimate selected articles were highly related to our target. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the literature quality. A fixed or random effect model was performed in the meta-analysis depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies. The Mantel-Haenszelt test with relative risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to measure the effect indicator of binary data, while the inverse variance method with weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% CI was used to measure the effect indicator of continuous data. Results: A totally of 3,647 cases (1,555 cases treated with ASA and 2,092 cases treated with SM) were included. The results of the systematic review indicated no statistically significant difference in postoperative all-cause mortality (RR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.65-1.04; P = 0.10) between patients treated with ASA and SM, but both the reduction in the postoperative left ventricular outflow tract pressure gradient (WMD = 9.35 mmHg, 95% CI: 5.38-13.31, P < 0.00001) and the post-operative improvement on cardiac function, assessed by the grade of New York Heart Association (NYHA), compared to pre-operative measurements (WMD = 0.13; 95% CI: 0.00-0.26; P < 0.04) in the ASA group were slightly inferior to those in the SM group. In addition, both the risk of pacemaker implantation (RR = 2.83, 95% CI: 2.06-3.88; P < 0.00001) and the risk of reoperation (RR = 11.23, 95% CI: 6.21-20.31; P < 0.00001) are recorded at a higher level after ASA procedure. Conclusion: Both ASA and SM have a high degree of safety, but the reduction in the postoperative left ventricular outflow tract pressure gradient and the improvement on cardiac function are slightly inferior to SM. In addition, both the risk of pacemaker implantation and the risk of reoperation are recorded at a higher level after ASA procedure. The operative plan should be chosen through multidisciplinary discussions in combination with the wishes of the patients and the actual clinical situation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available