4.7 Article

Quantifying telomeric lncRNAs using PNA-labelled RNA-Flow FISH (RNA-Flow)

Journal

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-03452-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Universities (MCIU) (MCIU/FEDER) [RTI2018- 093330-B-I00]
  2. Ramon Areces Foundation [CIVP19S7917]
  3. Autonomous Community of Madrid, Spain [B2017/BMD-3778]
  4. Spanish Association Against Cancer (AECC) [PROYE18054PIRI]
  5. Spanish Ministry
  6. Juan de la Cierva fellowship program [IJCI-2016-29155]
  7. Ramon Areces Foundation
  8. Bank of Santander

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Telomeric-associated long non-coding RNAs TERRA and TERC can be quantified in culture cell lines and human PBMCs using peptide nucleic acid probes with flow cytometry (RNA-Flow). This method, called RNA-Flow, allows easy and reliable quantification of lncRNAs, with broad applications in basic research and clinical diagnostics. Additionally, the staining protocol presented in this study has been proven useful for detecting and quantifying these lncRNAs on unfixed cells using confocal microscopy.
Here we present a method to detect and quantify long non-coding RNAs, in particular those related to telomeres. By coupling the specificity of a peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probe with flow cytometry we have quantified cellular levels of TERRA and TERC lncRNAs in culture cell lines and PBMCs. This easy-to-use method appointed RNA-Flow allows reliable lncRNA quantification with broad applications in basic research and clinical diagnostics. In addition, the staining protocol presented here was proven useful for the detection and quantification of such lncRNAs on unfixed cells using confocal microscopy. Telomeric-associated long non-coding RNAs TERRA and TERC can be quantified in culture cell lines and human PBMCs using peptide nucleic acid probes with flow cytometry (RNA-Flow).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available