4.6 Article

Ointment-Based Combination of Dittrichia viscosa L. and Marrubium vulgare L. Accelerate Burn Wound Healing

Journal

PHARMACEUTICALS
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ph15030289

Keywords

D. viscosa; M. vulgare; analgesic; anti-inflammatory; wound healing

Funding

  1. Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [PNURSP2022R165]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dittrichia viscosa and Marrubium vulgare have high potency to heal wounds and showed promising results for burn healing.
Burns constitute a major challenge in medical science, and plants can be part of the solution. Dittrichia viscosa L. (Asteraceae) and Marrubium vulgare L. (Lamiaceae) are widely used in Moroccan traditional medicine to treat several diseases and possess high potency to cure wounds. This study aimed to investigate in vivo the analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and burn-healing effects of both plants and their mixture. The hydro-ethanolic extract of both plants was analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection (HPLC-DAD). Burns were conducted on dorsal part of rats, and the wound healing process was evaluated during 21 days. Gallic acid, caffeic acid, ferulic acid, and quercetin were identified in M. vulgare extract. The analysis recorded the presence of caffeic acid, rosmarinic acid, rutin, and quercetin in D. viscosa. The group treated with the mixture showed the lowest abdominal contractions (30.4 +/- 7.52) with the highest percentage of inhibition (69.12 +/- 7.04%). The inhibition of paw inflammation for M. vulgare was 47.65%, followed by D. viscosa (33.86%) and the mixture (30.41%). The mixture showed the highest wound contraction at day 7 (33.16 +/- 14.33%) and day 14 (87.54 +/- 3.98%). D. viscosa showed the highest wound contraction on the 21st day (99.28 +/- 0.44%). In conclusion, both plants and their combination showed promising results for burn healing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available