4.7 Article

Relationship between Mechanical Ventilation and Histological Fibrosis in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Undergoing Open Lung Biopsy

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jpm12030474

Keywords

mechanical ventilation; acute respiratory distress syndrome; open lung biopsy; histology; diffuse alveolar damage; pulmonary fibrosis; idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; outcomes

Funding

  1. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital [CMRPG3K1151, CMRPG3L0821]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that prompt action to prevent injurious mechanical stretching of lung tissue and subsequent fibrosis may have a positive impact on clinical outcomes.
Background: Mechanical ventilation brings the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury, which can lead to pulmonary fibrosis and prolonged mechanical ventilation. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who received open lung biopsy between March 2006 and December 2019. Results: A total of 68 ARDS patients receiving open lung biopsy with diffuse alveolar damage (DAD; the hallmark pathology of ARDS) were analyzed and stratified into non-fibrosis (n = 56) and fibrosis groups (n = 12). The duration of ventilator usage and time spent in the intensive care unit and hospital stay were all significantly higher in the fibrosis group. Hospital mortality was higher in the fibrosis than in the non-fibrosis group (67% vs. 57%, p = 0.748). A multivariable logistic regression model demonstrated that mechanical power at ARDS diagnosis and ARDS duration before biopsy were independently associated with histological fibrosis at open lung biopsy (odds ratio 1.493 (95% CI 1.014-2.200), p = 0.042; odds ratio 1.160 (95% CI 1.052-1.278), p = 0.003, respectively). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that prompt action aimed at staving off injurious mechanical stretching of lung parenchyma and subsequent progression to fibrosis may have a positive effect on clinical outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available